• About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu

The Risk Coalition

  • About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
pexels-ann-h-6980526.jpg

Resilience and the impact of leadership

March 24, 2021

Recent months have certainly tested the limits and boundaries of organisational resilience like never before. However, despite Covid-19, the threat landscape has not significantly changed but rather we see evidence that it has intensified many pre-existing threats and risks to organisations.  Whilst some organisations have coped well with the impacts of Covid-19, others have struggled to adapt to an environment that requires flexibility, rapid decision making and clarity of communication.

Crucially, businesses have seen that their long-standing practices of managing risk and responding to significant disruptions may no longer be sufficient to protect their personnel, assets, revenue, and reputation.  To better understand our clients’ perspectives on these issues, Control Risks conducted the 2020 Global Resilience Survey and compiled the data to distil meaningful conclusions and trends to highlight how global business is practically implementing resilience programmes. 

Our survey highlights that effective leadership is still regarded as one of the most important resilience principles and having a dedicated crisis or continuity leadership really seems to have made a positive impact, those organisations who had more positive business outcomes to Covid-19, were much more likely to have been supported by a dedicated crisis and continuity team. 

The survey results also demonstrated that resilience professionals are playing a broader, more strategic role founded on better collaboration across traditional silos.  More mature respondents noted that Covid-19 ‘reinforced corporate resilience effectiveness and value’.  Much of the collaboration was attributed to the somewhat unique all-hands-on-deck, ‘people first, business second’ approach most companies took to the crisis.  The sense of ‘facing a common enemy’ was not uncommon.  Companies say this bred goodwill and took this as positive perception of their crisis response.  However, organisations should not be complacent – the next crisis will be different!

The survey additionally highlighted that organisational risk and resilience teams would benefit from a joined-up approach that would enable organisations to better identify and track threats and risks.  Closer working relationships between these two functions can improve the quality of risk management and additionally enable closer alignment in response to physical and cyber threats.  With cyber threats on the increase, especially with the rapid up take in digitisation and remote working, joined up leadership will avoid threats falling between the gaps.

The survey confirms that Covid-19 has shone a light on the often underappreciated, yet incredibly valuable, role of resilience professionals.  As our thoughts turn to ‘return to the office’ planning, employees and customers will expect to be walking into a safe and secure environment, meaning there is even more pressure to ‘get it right’ soon.  By elevating the role of resilience leaders and recognising the value that they bring organisations will feel increased comfort that they are prepared and meeting their duty of care requirements, in perhaps a more efficient and effective manner. 

Andy Cox is a Partner in the Crisis and Security Consulting practice at Control Risks.  He delivers risk consulting services and business protection advice to clients across Europe and Africa.

Tags: Andy Cox
Prev / Next

Blog

Featured
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
Uncovering a hidden risk - focusing on intelligibility
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
December 15, 2025
Risk Matters: ECCTA – in the Boardroom
December 15, 2025
December 15, 2025
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
Strengthening risk oversight
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
September 16, 2025
True, Fair... and Future-Proof: Risk Accounting for a New Era
September 16, 2025
September 16, 2025
September 16, 2025
Risk Matters Blog – The Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
September 16, 2025
September 16, 2025
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
March 20, 2024
Neil Tinegate
What should boards know about digital technology?
March 20, 2024
Neil Tinegate
March 20, 2024
Neil Tinegate
March 15, 2024
Francis Kean
The insolvency risk for company directors - are you swimming naked?
March 15, 2024
Francis Kean
March 15, 2024
Francis Kean