• About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu

The Risk Coalition

  • About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact

How to mitigate the risk of cyber security breaches – part 1

October 09, 2023

Cyber security breaches are increasingly featuring in the news and we only get to hear about the major ones in the mainstream media.  They are a significant risk for organisations and can have devastating results for the companies and people involved.  They can result in serious financial impact, lost customers and reputational damage to companies.  Release of personal sensitive or confidential information can put people’s lives at risk as reported in the August 2023 Met Police and Northern Ireland Police data breaches.  Any data breach can cause significant user anxiety even if their individual data has not been hacked.  An affected user is likely to share their bad experiences with their friends and family or via social media which can further impact an organisations reputation.

There seems to be an increasing number of hostile actors probing for cyber security weaknesses, infecting company systems with malware and seeking to exploit stolen company and user data.  The increasing use of cloud technologies increases the potential cyber attack surface area for an organisation.  If employees are working from home, their laptop may connect to other Internet of Things (IoT) devices within their home which may be lacking in security features, thus providing potential cyber attack access points.

There is a lot that can be done to reduce the risk of cyber security breaches and improve resiliency of systems in order to minimise their affect. There are two main aspects to consider – prevention and response.  The Three Lines of Defence approach  (3LoD) is a well-established model for the management, governance and assurance for cyber security.  However, the initial line of defence to minimise risks lies with organisations’ culture and the employees. 

Organisations need to embed security within their culture and governance and ensure that all levels of the organisation understand the importance and value of security.  People are often the weakest part of an organisation’s cyber defence.  Humans make mistakes, lose things and can be tricked and manipulated.  So it is imperative that organisations ensure that their employees are an effective initial line of defence rather than a weakness.  Organisations need to embed security within their culture and governance and ensure that all levels of the organisation understand the importance and value of security.  This can be achieved through improved awareness, improved security skills, training, prompt off-boarding (to ensure disgruntled leavers are unable to cause any malicious damage to systems) and privileged user-ID management (for users with higher level of authorisation or access).  Organisations need to deploy a ‘security first’ mind-set and need to address the potential conflict between security requirements versus the pressure to get on with the job.  Employees need to be productive whilst working securely and even though this may slightly reduce productivity, the impact of dealing with a major cyber attack or data breach will be much greater.

Many employees will find security training useful for their personal life too since they need to keep their personal devices and data secure, avoid malware and viruses and be able to recognise and avoid scams.

The increase in phishing attacks will affect employees at work and home.  The main reason that they are so widespread is that they are very effective with large numbers of people falling for them.  Phishing employs a range of psychological manipulation techniques to get the person to click on a link or open an attachment that contains malicious software.  Phishing preys on people’s fears, anxieties or emotions in order to get them to lower their defences.

A good cyber security training programme should be easy to sell to employees and a quick win-win for both the organisation and the employee.  Such a programme should be frequently updated to cover the latest digital threats, identifying common security blind spots within the organisation and any actual cyber attack or security issue examples from within the organisation.  The training should include standard vocabulary, general physical and data security, different types of cyber attack, what to look out for and who to contact in the event of an issue.  Ideally the training should be interactive and include a set of relevant questions that employees need to answer correctly in order to complete the training.

Organisations need to create a safe environment where employees feel they can report cyber issues, equipment loses or data loses as soon as they happen, without fear of being penalised.  If issues are reported promptly then actions can be taken to minimise impacts.  For example, devices can be removed from networks, accounts locked or, passwords change.  If the carrot approach does not work, it may be necessary to introduce mandatory training, the completion of which can be linked to reviews and pay rises. The effectiveness of cyber security training and awareness can be tested by using test phishing emails to see how many employees click on the test cyber attack link.

Deploying a comprehensive cyber strategy including organisation culture, training, three lines of defence, disaster recovery and governance is essential to address the risk of cyber attacks.

There will be a follow-on blog post providing more information on minimising cyber risks through the deployment of the three lines of defence model (3LoD) and disaster recovery.

Jim Watson is a Management Consultant with over 30 years experience at IBM UK who is currently working as an independent member of the Audit and Risk Assurance Committee at the Department of Business and Trade

Tags: Jim Watson
Prev / Next

Blog

Featured
Boards do not have a risk problem.  They have a decision problem.
July 22, 2026
Boards do not have a risk problem.  They have a decision problem.
July 22, 2026

Boards now receive more risk information than ever.  Dashboards are richer, risk packs are more sophisticated and oversight frameworks are more mature.  Yet the key question is whether this has really improved the quality of board decision making.  In some organisations, more risk information has sharpened oversight.  In others, it has created more caution and more process comfort without making the decision itself any clearer.  The Risk Coalition’s recent Risk Matters roundtable considered the issues around information and decision making.

Read more →
July 22, 2026
AI governance: why boards need to look beneath the surface
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom
AI governance: why boards need to look beneath the surface
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom

When it comes to AI, in the boardroom there is recognition that something material is changing.  But there isn’t always a shared view of where it sits, who owns it or how it should shape decisions.  This gap matters and, with AI, the optics of governance can arrive well before the substance.

Developing frameworks and committees bring structure, provide a common language and signal that an issue is being taken seriously – but AI does not behave like traditional technology.  AI-enabled features appear inside mainstream tools and its capability can span processes, functions and suppliers in ways that are not immediately visible.  In a recent Risk Coalition roundtable, Pauline Norstrom, characterised this as an iceberg problem, and discussed the risks and challenges that all boards need to be aware of.

Read more →
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom
Uncovering a hidden risk - focusing on intelligibility
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
Uncovering a hidden risk - focusing on intelligibility
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars

Across sectors, there is an increasing focus by regulators on consumer understanding, as well as preventing harm and confusion by ensuring that key disclosures are made more intelligible.  At present, the form and format of disclosures prescribed by law and regulation continue to be the dominant influence on how firms communicate, from pre-sales information, terms and conditions, contractual agreements, to post-sales communications.  These rigid disclosure rules often work at odds with the ability of consumers to understand the communications, and we are now seeing regulators focus increasingly on removing prescription to ensure a focus on better outcomes.  Ewan Willars from Amplified Global discusses the changes that are taking place.  

Read more →
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
Go to jail.jpg
December 15, 2025
Risk Matters: ECCTA – in the Boardroom
December 15, 2025
Read more →
December 15, 2025
Strengthening risk oversight
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
Strengthening risk oversight
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma

Risk governance is an essential element of decision making by organisations, even more so today in a complex, unpredictable and fast-changing business environment. Risk arrangements at board level can miss the point if they focus only on mitigating downside risk - they are in danger of losing sight of new opportunities that are necessarily grasped to ensure long-term sustainability. Hanif Barma summarises a recent roundtable discussion jointly hosted by Diligent and the Risk Coalition. A major conclusion of the discussion, which involved board members and senior risk professionals, was that a change in mindsets and behaviours was needed to drive effective risk governance.

Read more →
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
September 16, 2025
True, Fair... and Future-Proof: Risk Accounting for a New Era
September 16, 2025
Read more →
September 16, 2025
Risk Matters Blog – The Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
September 16, 2025
Risk Matters Blog – The Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
September 16, 2025
Read more →
September 16, 2025
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova

The business world has long wrestled with the question of purpose beyond profit. But in the era of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance), this debate has become more than philosophical – it’s a battleground where culture wars, regulatory demands and investor expectations collide. In this Risk Coalition blog, Vera Cherepanova looks ahead and considers the evolution and challenges of the ESG landscape, and discusses how this might evolve in future.

Read more →
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes

Heightened economic volatility, technological disruption and geopolitical tensions impact all organisations today - whatever their sector. This means that internal audit and risk professionals are under more pressure than ever to help their organisations remain resilient. The Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors (Chartered IIA)’s new Internal Audit Code of Practice - now in force - designed to strengthen internal audit functions and support organisations in tackling these emerging risks head-on, raising the bar for the profession across financial services, private, and third sectors. Mo Warsame from the Chartered IIA explains why internal audit and risk management need to work together to navigate these ever-increasingly challenging risks.

Read more →
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris

Phishing is a significant IT risk and this risk is largely a behavioural one. It is estimated that 90% of cyber attacks originate with a phishing attack so, with cyber regularly identified by boards as one of the biggest risks their businesses faces, it is useful to be reminded what the warning signs are, and how to best prepare and respond. Polly Williams tells us how to avoid the common pitfalls.

Read more →
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie

In the world of corporate governance, the question of whether a principles-based approach or a rules-based approach is the most effective is often a matter of debate. Different jurisdictions and different regulators take alternative approaches and, indeed, different approaches may be followed at different times. Felix Ritchie considers these two alternative approaches in his blog for the Risk Coalition. He looks at the cross-sector consultation document, Raising Your Game from the Risk Coalition and he draws on this to provides him with some lessons for data governance.

Read more →
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris

People risk is nowadays recognised as a very wide-ranging concept, in its many dimensions. Gone are the days when this focused solely on headcount (we haven’t got enough people! or, we can’t afford the people we have!) and their capability (we haven’t got the right skill sets!). Wellbeing is now recognised as a key part of people risk, and an important aspect of this is burnout. Burnout is a state of complete mental and physical exhaustion, where we become so overwhelmed that our performance at work can suffer, while physical and mental health issues can also affect us outside of the work environment. If not addressed and adequately managed, it can easily become a feature of high perfoming businesses. Jane Hunter discusses how to maintain high standards and high levels of performance without suffering burnout.

Read more →
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed

Increasing personal accountability was the focus of the Senior Managers and  Certification Regime (SMCR), introduced by the financial regulators following the 2008 financial crisis.  However, has individual accountability really resulted since the introduction of SMCR, have behaviours changed and has governance and risk culture improved?  These are questions that Afshan Moeed considered in her now-completed PhD project, and she discusses this in her blog.

Read more →
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris

Robotics and artificial intelligence have been in the public consciousness for decades, but only in recent years have we really started to comprehend the technology’s sheer potential. Businesses of any size now have the chance to leverage AI to keep up with the competition, to make better informed decisions, and to improve operational efficiency. Craig Morris discusses the key developments to watch out for in three critical sectors: healthcare, environmental sustainability and cyber security.

Read more →
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker

Do a firm’s risk management activities actually create value? Companies increasingly spend time and money implementing a range of risk norms and frameworks whose focus is often on risk identification, analysis, and risk reporting; these are risk process activities that do not create value for decision-makers argues Stefan Hunziker. He say that, typically, nothing has been managed and no decision has been made better by these processes. In this blog, he gets to the heart of risk management - explaining that its single purpose is increasing decision quality.

Read more →
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker