• About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu

The Risk Coalition

  • About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact

How to mitigate the risk of cyber security breaches – part 2

October 18, 2023

Part 1 of my ‘How to mitigate the risk of cyber security breaches’ blog post focused on mitigating cyber risks with the employees and organisation culture forming the initial line of defence.

This blog post covers the risk mitigation of the Three Lines of Defence (3LoD) model, technology and disaster recovery.

The three lines of defence are:

  1. Information technology (IT) and security controls

  2. Risk management and compliance

  3. Internal audit.

The IT and security controls will vary depending on the organisation IT landscape, technologies and level of outsourcing and can be broadly split into business IT (the applications and services needed to run the organisation’s business) and security IT (the tools and technologies used to provide a line of defence around the business IT to keep it secure).  To keep an organisation secure additional security IT technologies need to be added to deal with new cyber threats and minimise risks.

For both business and security IT, an organisation should use a software inventory/asset tool to provide a detailed inventory of all software – name, version/release/maintenance (VRM) level and  end of service tracking.  To combat security threats it is important that software is in service and at the current patch level, so organisations should have software upgrade/patching strategy and plan.

Organisations need to implement a comprehensive set of security tools that are appropriate to their business.  It is important to identify the most valuable and confidential data and ensure that appropriate security tools and controls are used to minimise risks.  IT security tools have become more sophisticated over the years from the early days of anti-virus tools (which are still important) and now include technologies such as penetration testing, code vulnerability scanning, network zones, end point monitoring, distributed denial of service monitoring, encryption key management, identity and access management and multifactor authentication.

IT security tools should prevent and detect cyber attacks, however organisations also need a set of security controls to ensure the security tools are used with a set of procedures and administration controls to handle any security incidents.  Many organisations have in-house security teams to architect, implement and operate the overall security solution who are on hand 24x7 to monitor alerts and deal with security incidents.

Cloud computing and outsourcing contracts can increase the potential cyber attack surface area and security risks so the organisation needs to take responsibility for the overall IT risk management.  It needs to understand the security roles and responsibilities of each service provider in relation to security to ensure that the organisation has a full end to end security solution. Otherwise there is a risk that a service provider is a weak link in the overall security chain.

The risk management and compliance line of defence is part of the overall organisation’s risk governance and supports management to help ensure risk and controls are effectively managed.  Security risks need to be identified, assessed, monitored and reported along with other risks in the organisation.  The risk management and compliance functions should monitor the security first-line-of-defence controls to ensure they are properly designed, in place, and operating as intended.  The second line of defence serves an important purpose but because of its management function, it cannot be completely independent.

Regular internal audits evaluate the effectiveness of governance, risk management and control processes.  They should be performed by a team that are independent of the first two lines of defence and who have a separate management reporting line.  It is also worth considering having external auditors to perform a security audit to provide a fresh pair of eyes and provide a fully independent assessment of the overall security solution and controls.  In both cases it is important that the management organisation fully supports audits and acts on any recommendations.

Even with all of the security technologies and controls in place there is a risk that an attack (possibly from some new cyber attack weapon) can impact an organisation’s IT solution.  In a worst-case scenario this may require a rebuild of IT systems.  It is therefore important that organisations have a disaster recovery plan in place which is tested to ensure that systems can be restored from backups and rebuilt with the full software stack, applications and data in a reasonable period of time.  Some organisations have multi-site premises running active-standby or active-active systems which can help as long as an incident does not infect multiple sites.

With well designed and implemented lines of defence organisations can minimise the risks of cyber attacks however they also need to continually review and enhance their defences to deal with new threats.

The Three Lines of Defence Model for risk management and control was published by the Institute of Internal Auditors.  Further information is available from online sources, including organisations that have expanded/updated the model for IT security.

 

Jim Watson is a Management Consultant with over 30 years’ experience at IBM UK who is currently working as an independent member of the Audit and Risk Assurance Committee at the Department of Business and Trade

Tags: Jim Watson
Prev / Next

Blog

Featured
Boards do not have a risk problem.  They have a decision problem.
July 22, 2026
Boards do not have a risk problem.  They have a decision problem.
July 22, 2026

Boards now receive more risk information than ever.  Dashboards are richer, risk packs are more sophisticated and oversight frameworks are more mature.  Yet the key question is whether this has really improved the quality of board decision making.  In some organisations, more risk information has sharpened oversight.  In others, it has created more caution and more process comfort without making the decision itself any clearer.  The Risk Coalition’s recent Risk Matters roundtable considered the issues around information and decision making.

Read more →
July 22, 2026
AI governance: why boards need to look beneath the surface
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom
AI governance: why boards need to look beneath the surface
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom

When it comes to AI, in the boardroom there is recognition that something material is changing.  But there isn’t always a shared view of where it sits, who owns it or how it should shape decisions.  This gap matters and, with AI, the optics of governance can arrive well before the substance.

Developing frameworks and committees bring structure, provide a common language and signal that an issue is being taken seriously – but AI does not behave like traditional technology.  AI-enabled features appear inside mainstream tools and its capability can span processes, functions and suppliers in ways that are not immediately visible.  In a recent Risk Coalition roundtable, Pauline Norstrom, characterised this as an iceberg problem, and discussed the risks and challenges that all boards need to be aware of.

Read more →
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom
Uncovering a hidden risk - focusing on intelligibility
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
Uncovering a hidden risk - focusing on intelligibility
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars

Across sectors, there is an increasing focus by regulators on consumer understanding, as well as preventing harm and confusion by ensuring that key disclosures are made more intelligible.  At present, the form and format of disclosures prescribed by law and regulation continue to be the dominant influence on how firms communicate, from pre-sales information, terms and conditions, contractual agreements, to post-sales communications.  These rigid disclosure rules often work at odds with the ability of consumers to understand the communications, and we are now seeing regulators focus increasingly on removing prescription to ensure a focus on better outcomes.  Ewan Willars from Amplified Global discusses the changes that are taking place.  

Read more →
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
Go to jail.jpg
December 15, 2025
Risk Matters: ECCTA – in the Boardroom
December 15, 2025
Read more →
December 15, 2025
Strengthening risk oversight
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
Strengthening risk oversight
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma

Risk governance is an essential element of decision making by organisations, even more so today in a complex, unpredictable and fast-changing business environment. Risk arrangements at board level can miss the point if they focus only on mitigating downside risk - they are in danger of losing sight of new opportunities that are necessarily grasped to ensure long-term sustainability. Hanif Barma summarises a recent roundtable discussion jointly hosted by Diligent and the Risk Coalition. A major conclusion of the discussion, which involved board members and senior risk professionals, was that a change in mindsets and behaviours was needed to drive effective risk governance.

Read more →
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
September 16, 2025
True, Fair... and Future-Proof: Risk Accounting for a New Era
September 16, 2025
Read more →
September 16, 2025
Risk Matters Blog – The Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
September 16, 2025
Risk Matters Blog – The Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
September 16, 2025
Read more →
September 16, 2025
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova

The business world has long wrestled with the question of purpose beyond profit. But in the era of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance), this debate has become more than philosophical – it’s a battleground where culture wars, regulatory demands and investor expectations collide. In this Risk Coalition blog, Vera Cherepanova looks ahead and considers the evolution and challenges of the ESG landscape, and discusses how this might evolve in future.

Read more →
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes

Heightened economic volatility, technological disruption and geopolitical tensions impact all organisations today - whatever their sector. This means that internal audit and risk professionals are under more pressure than ever to help their organisations remain resilient. The Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors (Chartered IIA)’s new Internal Audit Code of Practice - now in force - designed to strengthen internal audit functions and support organisations in tackling these emerging risks head-on, raising the bar for the profession across financial services, private, and third sectors. Mo Warsame from the Chartered IIA explains why internal audit and risk management need to work together to navigate these ever-increasingly challenging risks.

Read more →
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris

Phishing is a significant IT risk and this risk is largely a behavioural one. It is estimated that 90% of cyber attacks originate with a phishing attack so, with cyber regularly identified by boards as one of the biggest risks their businesses faces, it is useful to be reminded what the warning signs are, and how to best prepare and respond. Polly Williams tells us how to avoid the common pitfalls.

Read more →
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie

In the world of corporate governance, the question of whether a principles-based approach or a rules-based approach is the most effective is often a matter of debate. Different jurisdictions and different regulators take alternative approaches and, indeed, different approaches may be followed at different times. Felix Ritchie considers these two alternative approaches in his blog for the Risk Coalition. He looks at the cross-sector consultation document, Raising Your Game from the Risk Coalition and he draws on this to provides him with some lessons for data governance.

Read more →
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris

People risk is nowadays recognised as a very wide-ranging concept, in its many dimensions. Gone are the days when this focused solely on headcount (we haven’t got enough people! or, we can’t afford the people we have!) and their capability (we haven’t got the right skill sets!). Wellbeing is now recognised as a key part of people risk, and an important aspect of this is burnout. Burnout is a state of complete mental and physical exhaustion, where we become so overwhelmed that our performance at work can suffer, while physical and mental health issues can also affect us outside of the work environment. If not addressed and adequately managed, it can easily become a feature of high perfoming businesses. Jane Hunter discusses how to maintain high standards and high levels of performance without suffering burnout.

Read more →
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed

Increasing personal accountability was the focus of the Senior Managers and  Certification Regime (SMCR), introduced by the financial regulators following the 2008 financial crisis.  However, has individual accountability really resulted since the introduction of SMCR, have behaviours changed and has governance and risk culture improved?  These are questions that Afshan Moeed considered in her now-completed PhD project, and she discusses this in her blog.

Read more →
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris

Robotics and artificial intelligence have been in the public consciousness for decades, but only in recent years have we really started to comprehend the technology’s sheer potential. Businesses of any size now have the chance to leverage AI to keep up with the competition, to make better informed decisions, and to improve operational efficiency. Craig Morris discusses the key developments to watch out for in three critical sectors: healthcare, environmental sustainability and cyber security.

Read more →
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker

Do a firm’s risk management activities actually create value? Companies increasingly spend time and money implementing a range of risk norms and frameworks whose focus is often on risk identification, analysis, and risk reporting; these are risk process activities that do not create value for decision-makers argues Stefan Hunziker. He say that, typically, nothing has been managed and no decision has been made better by these processes. In this blog, he gets to the heart of risk management - explaining that its single purpose is increasing decision quality.

Read more →
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker