• About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu

The Risk Coalition

  • About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact

Navigating Not Easily Quantifiable risks: the role of the Board Risk Committee

May 26, 2023

In today's rapidly evolving business landscape, organisations face various risks that are not easily quantifiable.   These risks, such as emerging threats, systemic issues, and strategic uncertainties, pose significant challenges to risk management and decision-making.  In this blog post, we will explore the role of the Board Risk Committee in dealing with these not easily quantifiable risks and the importance of effective risk governance in mitigating their impact.

Understanding Not Easily Quantifiable risks

Not easily quantifiable risks present unique challenges as they defy traditional risk quantification methods.  Unlike operational or credit risks, which can be measured and modelled to a certain extent, not easily quantifiable risks lack clear data and are often characterised by uncertainty, long-term implications, or low-frequency but high-impact events.  Examples include emerging risks, reputational damage and strategic uncertainties.

Moreover, risks that appear insignificant when considered individually can accumulate and lead to a systemic issue.  Focusing only on individual risks in isolation may hinder the identification of underlying systemic risks.  These risks, despite their potential impact, may remain unquantifiable if not examined holistically.

The role of the Board Risk Committee

The Board Risk Committee plays a crucial role in navigating not easily quantifiable risks. Its primary responsibility is to facilitate the exploration and discussion of such risks, generating alternative perspectives and fostering critical thinking.  By challenging the executive and pushing for a deeper understanding of these risks, the committee adds value to the risk management process.

One key aspect of managing not easily quantifiable risks is scenario planning.  For example, by developing black swan scenarios and engaging in narrative-based discussions, the committee exercises more freedom of thought while exploring potential vulnerabilities, stakeholder reactions, and organisational responses.

This approach goes beyond numbers and encourages a holistic evaluation of the breadth of potential outcomes and resilience measures.  By exploring extreme possibilities, the committee can better assess the resilience of the organisation and identify potential vulnerabilities.

Furthermore, the committee should advocate for a broader view of risk management beyond purely financial considerations.  Risks that fall under the not easily quantifiable category, such as cultural, governance, and strategic risks, require attention and appropriate mitigation measures.  By challenging the executive to provide the right data and considering various sources and analyses, the committee ensures a comprehensive understanding of the risks at hand.

Enhancing risk governance and decision making

Dealing with not easily quantifiable risks effectively requires a shift in mindset.  It is important to recognise that risks cannot always be neatly quantified and that traditional risk frameworks may not adequately capture these complexities.  Instead, a balance between common sense, good judgment, and established methodologies should be sought.

Organisations must strike a balance between quantification and qualitative assessment.  While quantification remains essential for risk management, a sole reliance on numbers may overlook critical aspects of risk, such as uncertainty and emerging threats.  The Board Risk Committee should advocate for a more comprehensive approach that includes narrative-based storytelling and qualitative evaluations.

Promoting a culture of open discussion and information sharing is also crucial.  The committee should encourage executives to provide accurate and relevant data while challenging existing assumptions and biases.  By fostering a constructive dialogue, the committee can help align different stakeholders' perspectives and create a common understanding of the risks under consideration.

Conclusion

In an increasingly complex and uncertain business environment, not easily quantifiable risks pose significant challenges to organisations.  The role of the Board Risk Committee becomes paramount in addressing these risks effectively.  By facilitating exploration, encouraging alternative perspectives, and advocating for a comprehensive risk management approach, the committee plays a vital role in ensuring organisations are resilient in the face of uncertainty.  Through a combination of scenario planning, narrative-based discussions, and effective risk governance, organisations can navigate these risks with greater confidence and make informed decisions that safeguard their long-term success.

Chris Burt is a co-founder of the Risk Coalition and a principal at Halex Consulting. His blog is based on a recent roundtable discussion of the Risk Committee Chairs Forum (RCCF). The RCCF was established by the Risk Coalition to provide an opportunity for board risk committee chairs to exchange views and discuss matters of common concern. To find out more about RCCF, please contact the Risk Coalition Team.

Tags: Chris Burt
Prev / Next

Blog

Featured
Boards do not have a risk problem.  They have a decision problem.
July 22, 2026
Boards do not have a risk problem.  They have a decision problem.
July 22, 2026

Boards now receive more risk information than ever.  Dashboards are richer, risk packs are more sophisticated and oversight frameworks are more mature.  Yet the key question is whether this has really improved the quality of board decision making.  In some organisations, more risk information has sharpened oversight.  In others, it has created more caution and more process comfort without making the decision itself any clearer.  The Risk Coalition’s recent Risk Matters roundtable considered the issues around information and decision making.

Read more →
July 22, 2026
AI governance: why boards need to look beneath the surface
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom
AI governance: why boards need to look beneath the surface
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom

When it comes to AI, in the boardroom there is recognition that something material is changing.  But there isn’t always a shared view of where it sits, who owns it or how it should shape decisions.  This gap matters and, with AI, the optics of governance can arrive well before the substance.

Developing frameworks and committees bring structure, provide a common language and signal that an issue is being taken seriously – but AI does not behave like traditional technology.  AI-enabled features appear inside mainstream tools and its capability can span processes, functions and suppliers in ways that are not immediately visible.  In a recent Risk Coalition roundtable, Pauline Norstrom, characterised this as an iceberg problem, and discussed the risks and challenges that all boards need to be aware of.

Read more →
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom
Uncovering a hidden risk - focusing on intelligibility
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
Uncovering a hidden risk - focusing on intelligibility
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars

Across sectors, there is an increasing focus by regulators on consumer understanding, as well as preventing harm and confusion by ensuring that key disclosures are made more intelligible.  At present, the form and format of disclosures prescribed by law and regulation continue to be the dominant influence on how firms communicate, from pre-sales information, terms and conditions, contractual agreements, to post-sales communications.  These rigid disclosure rules often work at odds with the ability of consumers to understand the communications, and we are now seeing regulators focus increasingly on removing prescription to ensure a focus on better outcomes.  Ewan Willars from Amplified Global discusses the changes that are taking place.  

Read more →
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
Go to jail.jpg
December 15, 2025
Risk Matters: ECCTA – in the Boardroom
December 15, 2025
Read more →
December 15, 2025
Strengthening risk oversight
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
Strengthening risk oversight
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma

Risk governance is an essential element of decision making by organisations, even more so today in a complex, unpredictable and fast-changing business environment. Risk arrangements at board level can miss the point if they focus only on mitigating downside risk - they are in danger of losing sight of new opportunities that are necessarily grasped to ensure long-term sustainability. Hanif Barma summarises a recent roundtable discussion jointly hosted by Diligent and the Risk Coalition. A major conclusion of the discussion, which involved board members and senior risk professionals, was that a change in mindsets and behaviours was needed to drive effective risk governance.

Read more →
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
September 16, 2025
True, Fair... and Future-Proof: Risk Accounting for a New Era
September 16, 2025
Read more →
September 16, 2025
Risk Matters Blog – The Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
September 16, 2025
Risk Matters Blog – The Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
September 16, 2025
Read more →
September 16, 2025
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova

The business world has long wrestled with the question of purpose beyond profit. But in the era of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance), this debate has become more than philosophical – it’s a battleground where culture wars, regulatory demands and investor expectations collide. In this Risk Coalition blog, Vera Cherepanova looks ahead and considers the evolution and challenges of the ESG landscape, and discusses how this might evolve in future.

Read more →
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes

Heightened economic volatility, technological disruption and geopolitical tensions impact all organisations today - whatever their sector. This means that internal audit and risk professionals are under more pressure than ever to help their organisations remain resilient. The Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors (Chartered IIA)’s new Internal Audit Code of Practice - now in force - designed to strengthen internal audit functions and support organisations in tackling these emerging risks head-on, raising the bar for the profession across financial services, private, and third sectors. Mo Warsame from the Chartered IIA explains why internal audit and risk management need to work together to navigate these ever-increasingly challenging risks.

Read more →
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris

Phishing is a significant IT risk and this risk is largely a behavioural one. It is estimated that 90% of cyber attacks originate with a phishing attack so, with cyber regularly identified by boards as one of the biggest risks their businesses faces, it is useful to be reminded what the warning signs are, and how to best prepare and respond. Polly Williams tells us how to avoid the common pitfalls.

Read more →
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie

In the world of corporate governance, the question of whether a principles-based approach or a rules-based approach is the most effective is often a matter of debate. Different jurisdictions and different regulators take alternative approaches and, indeed, different approaches may be followed at different times. Felix Ritchie considers these two alternative approaches in his blog for the Risk Coalition. He looks at the cross-sector consultation document, Raising Your Game from the Risk Coalition and he draws on this to provides him with some lessons for data governance.

Read more →
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris

People risk is nowadays recognised as a very wide-ranging concept, in its many dimensions. Gone are the days when this focused solely on headcount (we haven’t got enough people! or, we can’t afford the people we have!) and their capability (we haven’t got the right skill sets!). Wellbeing is now recognised as a key part of people risk, and an important aspect of this is burnout. Burnout is a state of complete mental and physical exhaustion, where we become so overwhelmed that our performance at work can suffer, while physical and mental health issues can also affect us outside of the work environment. If not addressed and adequately managed, it can easily become a feature of high perfoming businesses. Jane Hunter discusses how to maintain high standards and high levels of performance without suffering burnout.

Read more →
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed

Increasing personal accountability was the focus of the Senior Managers and  Certification Regime (SMCR), introduced by the financial regulators following the 2008 financial crisis.  However, has individual accountability really resulted since the introduction of SMCR, have behaviours changed and has governance and risk culture improved?  These are questions that Afshan Moeed considered in her now-completed PhD project, and she discusses this in her blog.

Read more →
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris

Robotics and artificial intelligence have been in the public consciousness for decades, but only in recent years have we really started to comprehend the technology’s sheer potential. Businesses of any size now have the chance to leverage AI to keep up with the competition, to make better informed decisions, and to improve operational efficiency. Craig Morris discusses the key developments to watch out for in three critical sectors: healthcare, environmental sustainability and cyber security.

Read more →
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker

Do a firm’s risk management activities actually create value? Companies increasingly spend time and money implementing a range of risk norms and frameworks whose focus is often on risk identification, analysis, and risk reporting; these are risk process activities that do not create value for decision-makers argues Stefan Hunziker. He say that, typically, nothing has been managed and no decision has been made better by these processes. In this blog, he gets to the heart of risk management - explaining that its single purpose is increasing decision quality.

Read more →
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker