• About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu

The Risk Coalition

  • About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact

Navigating Not Easily Quantifiable risks: the role of the Board Risk Committee

May 26, 2023

In today's rapidly evolving business landscape, organisations face various risks that are not easily quantifiable.   These risks, such as emerging threats, systemic issues, and strategic uncertainties, pose significant challenges to risk management and decision-making.  In this blog post, we will explore the role of the Board Risk Committee in dealing with these not easily quantifiable risks and the importance of effective risk governance in mitigating their impact.

Understanding Not Easily Quantifiable risks

Not easily quantifiable risks present unique challenges as they defy traditional risk quantification methods.  Unlike operational or credit risks, which can be measured and modelled to a certain extent, not easily quantifiable risks lack clear data and are often characterised by uncertainty, long-term implications, or low-frequency but high-impact events.  Examples include emerging risks, reputational damage and strategic uncertainties.

Moreover, risks that appear insignificant when considered individually can accumulate and lead to a systemic issue.  Focusing only on individual risks in isolation may hinder the identification of underlying systemic risks.  These risks, despite their potential impact, may remain unquantifiable if not examined holistically.

The role of the Board Risk Committee

The Board Risk Committee plays a crucial role in navigating not easily quantifiable risks. Its primary responsibility is to facilitate the exploration and discussion of such risks, generating alternative perspectives and fostering critical thinking.  By challenging the executive and pushing for a deeper understanding of these risks, the committee adds value to the risk management process.

One key aspect of managing not easily quantifiable risks is scenario planning.  For example, by developing black swan scenarios and engaging in narrative-based discussions, the committee exercises more freedom of thought while exploring potential vulnerabilities, stakeholder reactions, and organisational responses.

This approach goes beyond numbers and encourages a holistic evaluation of the breadth of potential outcomes and resilience measures.  By exploring extreme possibilities, the committee can better assess the resilience of the organisation and identify potential vulnerabilities.

Furthermore, the committee should advocate for a broader view of risk management beyond purely financial considerations.  Risks that fall under the not easily quantifiable category, such as cultural, governance, and strategic risks, require attention and appropriate mitigation measures.  By challenging the executive to provide the right data and considering various sources and analyses, the committee ensures a comprehensive understanding of the risks at hand.

Enhancing risk governance and decision making

Dealing with not easily quantifiable risks effectively requires a shift in mindset.  It is important to recognise that risks cannot always be neatly quantified and that traditional risk frameworks may not adequately capture these complexities.  Instead, a balance between common sense, good judgment, and established methodologies should be sought.

Organisations must strike a balance between quantification and qualitative assessment.  While quantification remains essential for risk management, a sole reliance on numbers may overlook critical aspects of risk, such as uncertainty and emerging threats.  The Board Risk Committee should advocate for a more comprehensive approach that includes narrative-based storytelling and qualitative evaluations.

Promoting a culture of open discussion and information sharing is also crucial.  The committee should encourage executives to provide accurate and relevant data while challenging existing assumptions and biases.  By fostering a constructive dialogue, the committee can help align different stakeholders' perspectives and create a common understanding of the risks under consideration.

Conclusion

In an increasingly complex and uncertain business environment, not easily quantifiable risks pose significant challenges to organisations.  The role of the Board Risk Committee becomes paramount in addressing these risks effectively.  By facilitating exploration, encouraging alternative perspectives, and advocating for a comprehensive risk management approach, the committee plays a vital role in ensuring organisations are resilient in the face of uncertainty.  Through a combination of scenario planning, narrative-based discussions, and effective risk governance, organisations can navigate these risks with greater confidence and make informed decisions that safeguard their long-term success.

Chris Burt is a co-founder of the Risk Coalition and a principal at Halex Consulting. His blog is based on a recent roundtable discussion of the Risk Committee Chairs Forum (RCCF). The RCCF was established by the Risk Coalition to provide an opportunity for board risk committee chairs to exchange views and discuss matters of common concern. To find out more about RCCF, please contact the Risk Coalition Team.

Tags: Chris Burt
Prev / Next

Blog

Featured
Apr 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
Apr 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
Apr 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
Mar 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
Mar 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Mar 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Sep 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
Sep 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Sep 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Aug 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
Aug 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Aug 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Jul 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
Jul 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
Jul 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
Jun 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
Jun 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Jun 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
Mar 20, 2024
Neil Tinegate
What should boards know about digital technology?
Mar 20, 2024
Neil Tinegate
Mar 20, 2024
Neil Tinegate
Mar 15, 2024
Francis Kean
The insolvency risk for company directors - are you swimming naked?
Mar 15, 2024
Francis Kean
Mar 15, 2024
Francis Kean
Feb 29, 2024
Andy Watkins-Child
Are you sitting comfortably?  Cyber risk, board attestations and the implications for NEDs
Feb 29, 2024
Andy Watkins-Child
Feb 29, 2024
Andy Watkins-Child
Oct 24, 2023
Mamun Madaser
Risk management and internal audit should collaborate to navigate the poly-crisis of risk
Oct 24, 2023
Mamun Madaser
Oct 24, 2023
Mamun Madaser
Oct 18, 2023
Jim Watson
How to mitigate the risk of cyber security breaches – part 2
Oct 18, 2023
Jim Watson
Oct 18, 2023
Jim Watson
Oct 13, 2023
Nisha Sanghani
Risk management and internal controls: much (needed) work to do as a result of the proposed changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code
Oct 13, 2023
Nisha Sanghani
Oct 13, 2023
Nisha Sanghani
Oct 9, 2023
Jim Watson
How to mitigate the risk of cyber security breaches – part 1
Oct 9, 2023
Jim Watson
Oct 9, 2023
Jim Watson