• About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu

The Risk Coalition

  • About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact

Striking the right balance for aspiring FinTech and PayTech firms

November 26, 2021

From a risk management perspective, these are interesting times for small regulated FinTech or PayTech firms, which may still be micro-businesses. My experience is primarily in the FCA regulated space, at a time when we are about to see more public sector collaboration with private sector SMEs. On face value, this looks a really interesting opportunity, as reflected in the HMRC Open Banking public procurement award to micro-business, Ecospend, in February 2021.

Ecospend case study

The UK tax authority handed a £3m Open Banking contract to FinTech startup Ecospend, with the aim of making it easy for taxpayers to submit payments direct from their bank accounts, rather than through debit or credit card.

Viewed as a significant boost to the uptake of Open Banking services in the UK, HMRC worked with the Open Banking Implementation Entity (OBIE) on the procurement exercise, which went out to tender in 2020. HMRC expects that Account Information Services (AIS) will enable it to access customers' transactional data to deliver ‘enhanced and tailored financial services’. 

Two recent public tenders by the Crown Commercial Service and the Money and Pensions Service (MaPS) have reinforced the government commitment to work towards their aspiration of spending £1 in every £3 with SMEs by 2022. The UK government definition of SMEs encompasses micro (<10 FTEs, turnover <€2m), small (<50 FTEs, turnover <€10m) and medium-sized (<250 FTEs, turnover <€50m) businesses.

What is the regulatory concept of proportionality?

A proportionate approach is meant to mean tailoring regulatory supervision requirements to a firm's size, systemic importance, complexity and risk profile. Conversely, risk-based supervision may mean that micro-businesses suffer dis-proportionately in the emerging worlds of regulated FinTech and PayTech because of the higher risk permissions they hold in immature markets (e.g. PSD2).

Proportionality should aim to avoid rules that could distort the financial services market, for example, by unduly constraining its development, curbing competition or limiting the diversity of market participants.

MaPS wishes to encourage an approach which provides a sustainable operating environment for a diverse supply chain which includes start-ups, SMEs and voluntary, community and social enterprises (VCSEs). This includes a strong digital transformation agenda where use of ‘disruptive technologies’ feature prominently.

SMEs in the supply chain are required to contribute to the MaPS policy ambition through its approach to innovation and disruptive technologies to deliver at lower cost and/or higher quality. Continuous improvement is also a policy goal.

Hybrid & remote working operating models

The FCA published on 11 October 2021 their expectations for regulated firms with remote or hybrid working arrangements. The regulator is taking a forward look on trends in target operating models (TOMs) as part of their supervisory approach at a ‘portfolio level’. Unlike the energy sector, they have been monitoring the financial resilience of firms they supervise through the pandemic and coming out of it as transitional arrangements become transformational. 

Priority checks for SMEs:

  • Are your principal places of business substantially remote? 

  • Will the FCA be able to supervise you effectively, including outsourced functions?

  • Can those responsible for GRC and QA fulfil their SMF roles effectively?

  • Is any enhanced risk of consumer detriment reflected in your Conduct Risk Frameworks? 

  • Assuming changes in TOM, are there other heightened risks (e.g. Cyber-crime)?

  • Do temporary changes in operating practice following the pandemic need to be made more resilient (e.g. the shift from transitional to transformational, ability to flexibly scale)?

  • Have you checked the compliance and resilience of your whole supply chain? 


FCA Consumer Duty – July 2022

Given the introduction of the Consumer Duty in July 2022, it will be interesting to see the degree to which ‘culture’ fits into the FCA’s assessments around how this is achieved in a hybrid working model for newly established firms with associates that need to be enrolled into not only the business, but the supply chain that makes up the ‘customer journey’. 

This is being talked about more in the CCaaS world, especially around dealing with vulnerable customers and is very relevant in the regulated debt advice sector from an omni-channel perspective. Consistency of experience across channels and across the workforce will be key metrics going forward. 

MaPS has just closed a call for evidence on how MaPS funded face-to-face (F2F) debt advice providers coped during the pandemic when the sector effectively closed. One of their leading questions was “How has the pandemic affected the way you deliver debt advice?”. Future contingency planning, therefore, becomes critical in this scenario.   

The FCA wants to be able to supervise sustainable financial and operational resilience, which is always challenging for new market entrants where there may be demanding working capital, prudential, capital or safeguarding requirements that need to be met on a sustainable basis over the lifetime of a 3-5 year Business Plan. When operating in a volatile market like the one we are seeing coming out of the pandemic and Brexit, the strategic planning challenges can be daunting, especially when considering the necessity of meeting the government Policy Outcome of increasing supply chain resilience and capacity. 

The mythical government ‘levelling up’ White Paper may also have unintended consequences where key resources become more expensive when they realise their true value in a hybrid working environment. Start-ups and SMEs can often be badly impacted where remuneration packages are based on the future value of a business rather than offering high salaries. London salaries are becoming more accessible by employees that are entirely remotely based. 

Growing and diversifying supply chain opportunities is at the heart of government’s Industrial and Civil Society Strategies. They believe that an economy with diverse, resilient and innovative supply markets is a cornerstone of prosperity. They believe that it is also a commercial advantage to spreading risk more broadly since it reduces commercial risk. The question is whether SMEs can readily comply with this environment, both culturally and in terms of meeting stringent due diligence requirements. 

The government has outlined the requirement to drive greater resilience, capacity, innovation, use of disruptive technologies, green technologies, efficiency, quality, modernisation, productivity and collaboration/co-design in the supply chain. These are all laudable goals, but potentially place more burden on emerging micro-businesses in meeting the minimum credentials required to support such bids without having a guardian angel looking over you (e.g. a pre-approved major systems integrator).

In delivering its National Cyber Security Strategy, government’s objectives include having the means to ensure UK networks, data and systems are protected and resilient throughout the supply chain. By way of example, they reference the Cyber Essentials Plus scheme (requiring ISO27001 accreditation and cyber insurance). Closing vulnerabilities to cyber threats is a major consideration in the effective performance of a technology-based service delivery contract. Scaled penetration testing is expensive and iterative.  

Jessica Rusu (Chief Data, Information and Intelligence Officer at the FCA) made a speech on 2 November 2021 at the CDO Exchange for Financial Services. She has reinforced the investment FinTech and PayTech firms need to make to build trust and protect consumers. She has also highlighted the challenge of dealing with ‘insistent customers’ that may not act in their own best interests, which can be a real dilemma when faced with downstream consequences if claims management firms focus on high complaint levels in any regulated sector that brings in the Ombudsman.

“The threat landscape has shifted for consumers, with fraudsters and scammers benefitting from new technologies and new consumers being drawn to high-risk markets and products, motivated by competition with friends, family, acquaintances and the influence of social media.”

New kinds of consumers are being drawn to new markets and their behaviour isn’t always rational. The FCA’s recent surveys suggest more than 75% of people investing in high-risk products are motivated by competition with friends, family and acquaintances, with more half say that hype on social media and the news drove their decisions. This is making KYC and CDD checks even more challenging where behavioural and transactional data (e.g. Open Banking) are becoming increasingly important over more traditional sources of data (e.g. CRAs).

It is clear that the conduct risk frameworks and compliance monitoring programmes for regulated FinTech and PayTech firms are likely to be dis-proportionate to the size of the entity, but where the potential downstream rewards warrant the necessary investment in financial and operation resilience in systems & controls. This is beginning to be reflected in the private equity market coming alive again in this space.


Kevin Still is an aspiring iNED

Tags: Kevin Still
Prev / Next

Blog

Featured
Boards do not have a risk problem. &nbsp;They have a decision problem.
July 22, 2026
Boards do not have a risk problem.  They have a decision problem.
July 22, 2026

Boards now receive more risk information than ever.  Dashboards are richer, risk packs are more sophisticated and oversight frameworks are more mature.  Yet the key question is whether this has really improved the quality of board decision making.  In some organisations, more risk information has sharpened oversight.  In others, it has created more caution and more process comfort without making the decision itself any clearer.  The Risk Coalition’s recent Risk Matters roundtable considered the issues around information and decision making.

Read more →
July 22, 2026
AI governance: why boards need to look beneath the surface
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom
AI governance: why boards need to look beneath the surface
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom

When it comes to AI, in the boardroom there is recognition that something material is changing.  But there isn’t always a shared view of where it sits, who owns it or how it should shape decisions.  This gap matters and, with AI, the optics of governance can arrive well before the substance.

Developing frameworks and committees bring structure, provide a common language and signal that an issue is being taken seriously – but AI does not behave like traditional technology.  AI-enabled features appear inside mainstream tools and its capability can span processes, functions and suppliers in ways that are not immediately visible.  In a recent Risk Coalition roundtable, Pauline Norstrom, characterised this as an iceberg problem, and discussed the risks and challenges that all boards need to be aware of.

Read more →
June 14, 2026
Pauline Norstrom
Uncovering a hidden risk - focusing on intelligibility
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
Uncovering a hidden risk - focusing on intelligibility
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars

Across sectors, there is an increasing focus by regulators on consumer understanding, as well as preventing harm and confusion by ensuring that key disclosures are made more intelligible.  At present, the form and format of disclosures prescribed by law and regulation continue to be the dominant influence on how firms communicate, from pre-sales information, terms and conditions, contractual agreements, to post-sales communications.  These rigid disclosure rules often work at odds with the ability of consumers to understand the communications, and we are now seeing regulators focus increasingly on removing prescription to ensure a focus on better outcomes.  Ewan Willars from Amplified Global discusses the changes that are taking place.  

Read more →
May 8, 2026
Ewan Willars
Go to jail.jpg
December 15, 2025
Risk Matters: ECCTA – in the Boardroom
December 15, 2025
Read more →
December 15, 2025
Strengthening risk oversight
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
Strengthening risk oversight
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma

Risk governance is an essential element of decision making by organisations, even more so today in a complex, unpredictable and fast-changing business environment. Risk arrangements at board level can miss the point if they focus only on mitigating downside risk - they are in danger of losing sight of new opportunities that are necessarily grasped to ensure long-term sustainability. Hanif Barma summarises a recent roundtable discussion jointly hosted by Diligent and the Risk Coalition. A major conclusion of the discussion, which involved board members and senior risk professionals, was that a change in mindsets and behaviours was needed to drive effective risk governance.

Read more →
October 27, 2025
Hanif Barma
September 16, 2025
True, Fair... and Future-Proof: Risk Accounting for a New Era
September 16, 2025
Read more →
September 16, 2025
Risk Matters Blog – The Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
September 16, 2025
Risk Matters Blog – The Anatomy of a Ransomware Attack
September 16, 2025
Read more →
September 16, 2025
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova

The business world has long wrestled with the question of purpose beyond profit. But in the era of ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance), this debate has become more than philosophical – it’s a battleground where culture wars, regulatory demands and investor expectations collide. In this Risk Coalition blog, Vera Cherepanova looks ahead and considers the evolution and challenges of the ESG landscape, and discusses how this might evolve in future.

Read more →
April 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes

Heightened economic volatility, technological disruption and geopolitical tensions impact all organisations today - whatever their sector. This means that internal audit and risk professionals are under more pressure than ever to help their organisations remain resilient. The Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors (Chartered IIA)’s new Internal Audit Code of Practice - now in force - designed to strengthen internal audit functions and support organisations in tackling these emerging risks head-on, raising the bar for the profession across financial services, private, and third sectors. Mo Warsame from the Chartered IIA explains why internal audit and risk management need to work together to navigate these ever-increasingly challenging risks.

Read more →
March 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris

Phishing is a significant IT risk and this risk is largely a behavioural one. It is estimated that 90% of cyber attacks originate with a phishing attack so, with cyber regularly identified by boards as one of the biggest risks their businesses faces, it is useful to be reminded what the warning signs are, and how to best prepare and respond. Polly Williams tells us how to avoid the common pitfalls.

Read more →
September 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie

In the world of corporate governance, the question of whether a principles-based approach or a rules-based approach is the most effective is often a matter of debate. Different jurisdictions and different regulators take alternative approaches and, indeed, different approaches may be followed at different times. Felix Ritchie considers these two alternative approaches in his blog for the Risk Coalition. He looks at the cross-sector consultation document, Raising Your Game from the Risk Coalition and he draws on this to provides him with some lessons for data governance.

Read more →
August 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris

People risk is nowadays recognised as a very wide-ranging concept, in its many dimensions. Gone are the days when this focused solely on headcount (we haven’t got enough people! or, we can’t afford the people we have!) and their capability (we haven’t got the right skill sets!). Wellbeing is now recognised as a key part of people risk, and an important aspect of this is burnout. Burnout is a state of complete mental and physical exhaustion, where we become so overwhelmed that our performance at work can suffer, while physical and mental health issues can also affect us outside of the work environment. If not addressed and adequately managed, it can easily become a feature of high perfoming businesses. Jane Hunter discusses how to maintain high standards and high levels of performance without suffering burnout.

Read more →
July 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed

Increasing personal accountability was the focus of the Senior Managers and  Certification Regime (SMCR), introduced by the financial regulators following the 2008 financial crisis.  However, has individual accountability really resulted since the introduction of SMCR, have behaviours changed and has governance and risk culture improved?  These are questions that Afshan Moeed considered in her now-completed PhD project, and she discusses this in her blog.

Read more →
June 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris

Robotics and artificial intelligence have been in the public consciousness for decades, but only in recent years have we really started to comprehend the technology’s sheer potential. Businesses of any size now have the chance to leverage AI to keep up with the competition, to make better informed decisions, and to improve operational efficiency. Craig Morris discusses the key developments to watch out for in three critical sectors: healthcare, environmental sustainability and cyber security.

Read more →
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker

Do a firm’s risk management activities actually create value? Companies increasingly spend time and money implementing a range of risk norms and frameworks whose focus is often on risk identification, analysis, and risk reporting; these are risk process activities that do not create value for decision-makers argues Stefan Hunziker. He say that, typically, nothing has been managed and no decision has been made better by these processes. In this blog, he gets to the heart of risk management - explaining that its single purpose is increasing decision quality.

Read more →
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker