• About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Menu

The Risk Coalition

  • About us
  • Raising the Bar
  • Raising your Game
  • The Extra G - Geopolitical
  • Risk Matters - Roundtables
  • Leadership Team
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Contact

People risk: two key focus areas in an evolving risk landscape

February 15, 2022

The risk landscape of 2022 is perhaps clearer than many other years.  One area of risk stands out – People Risk.  Where failures occur it is often the actions or inactions of people which have been at the root cause of the issues identified.  And these risks will be exacerbated in 2022 by two main factors – staff shortages caused by ‘The Great Resignation’, and the challenges associated with the continuation of hybrid working. 

The Great Resignation

The loss of personnel can cause issues across all levels of the organisation:

  • Senior management – key person dependency, loss of strategic direction, inability to fulfil SMCR requirements

  • Back office –project completion risk, failures of systems and processes

  • Customer facing staff – customer detriment, increased errors, increased stress. 

In reducing the risks associated with staff losses, there are some quick wins, but firms should also take a more strategic view and consider some of the structural issues and push factors within the business that are causing staff to leave.  Mitigations include:

  • Leadership – throughout the pandemic and beyond, staff are looking for inspirational leaders who are exemplars of good practice.  People join organisations, but they leave bosses

  • Key person dependency and succession planning – understanding who the key people are and putting in place realistic succession plans is a key mitigation

  • Ways of working – employees today are looking for working environments with a greater degree of flexibility.  After two years of lock-down, firms attempting to enforce a full-time return to the office will see significant staff push-back.

BAU hybrid working

As Covid eases many firms are transitioning from the ways of working during lockdown (effectively an extended business continuity exercise) to a more formalised BAU hybrid working approach.  And in doing so, it is important for organisations to recognise the inherent risks that come with a decentralised delivery business model, such as: failures in staff oversight and culture, data security, weakened spans of control etc.

Firms need to recognise the risks and put in place a clear action plan to control them, including in relation to:

  • Risk monitoring and control – firms should recognise the enhanced risks that hybrid working can bring, and build this into the ERMF (extended risk management framework)

  • Culture – an effective culture is a key mechanism for promoting control and good practice, across a distributed workforce.  It is the glue that holds the organisation together

  • Management – effective managers are coaches not custodians. They are output not time focussed and are able to project culture and control across a decentralised workspace

  • Recruitment – with staffing pressures there is a temptation to put ‘bums on seats’.  But firms should select staff for the new normal – candidates who demonstrate self-motivation and integrity.

 

Frank Brown is Practice Lead at Bovill.  His blog is an extract from his paper which explores People Risk in greater detail

Tags: Frank Brown
Prev / Next

Blog

Featured
Apr 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
The future of ESG: navigating a fragmented landscape
Apr 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
Apr 15, 2025
Vera Cherepanova
Mar 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Internal audit and risk management must work together to navigate uncertainty
Mar 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Mar 6, 2025
Mo Warsame, Gavin Hayes
Sep 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Three key threats of phishing to be aware of
Sep 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Sep 4, 2024
Polly Williams, Mia Harris
Aug 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Principles versus rules in data and corporate governance
Aug 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Aug 25, 2024
Felix Ritchie
Jul 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
How can you maintain high standards in your business without suffering burnout?
Jul 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
Jul 16, 2024
Jane Hunter, Mia Harris
Jun 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Enforcement of individual accountability in UK banking: a new boardroom recipe for change or continuity?
Jun 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
Jun 2, 2024
Afshan Moeed
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
Three exciting new developments for AI in 2024 that you need to know about
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
May 28, 2024
Craig Morris, Mia Harris
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
The stuff of nightmares: risk management is shut down, and nobody notices
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
May 24, 2024
Stefan Hunziker
Mar 20, 2024
Neil Tinegate
What should boards know about digital technology?
Mar 20, 2024
Neil Tinegate
Mar 20, 2024
Neil Tinegate
Mar 15, 2024
Francis Kean
The insolvency risk for company directors - are you swimming naked?
Mar 15, 2024
Francis Kean
Mar 15, 2024
Francis Kean
Feb 29, 2024
Andy Watkins-Child
Are you sitting comfortably?  Cyber risk, board attestations and the implications for NEDs
Feb 29, 2024
Andy Watkins-Child
Feb 29, 2024
Andy Watkins-Child
Oct 24, 2023
Mamun Madaser
Risk management and internal audit should collaborate to navigate the poly-crisis of risk
Oct 24, 2023
Mamun Madaser
Oct 24, 2023
Mamun Madaser
Oct 18, 2023
Jim Watson
How to mitigate the risk of cyber security breaches – part 2
Oct 18, 2023
Jim Watson
Oct 18, 2023
Jim Watson
Oct 13, 2023
Nisha Sanghani
Risk management and internal controls: much (needed) work to do as a result of the proposed changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code
Oct 13, 2023
Nisha Sanghani
Oct 13, 2023
Nisha Sanghani
Oct 9, 2023
Jim Watson
How to mitigate the risk of cyber security breaches – part 1
Oct 9, 2023
Jim Watson
Oct 9, 2023
Jim Watson